A Canadian court rules that a thumbs-up emoji counts as a contract signature

A farmer will have to pay $61,000 after a Canadian court rules that a emoji serves as a contractual agreement. “This is the new reality,” says the authority.

A recent case in Canada It went viral after a court officially accepted as a contract signing a emoji with a thumbs up.

It happened in a court in Saskatchewan. Authorities stress that “the courts must adapt to the new reality” of the way people communicate. How was this lawsuit settled?

We recommend you

Thumb up

A grain buyer, Kent Mickleborough, texted a large number of customers in March 2021.

A farmer named Chris Achter agreed to sell 86 tons of flax at $13 a bushel, a unit of capacity for dry goods in English-speaking countries.

The buyer sent a text of agreement to the farmer and asked him to “confirm” that he had received the contract: the farmer emoji Thumb up.

What was the problem? Achter retired from the business after linen prices increased.

This caused the buyer to sue the farmer, arguing that the emoji it represented more than just receipt of the contract: it also represented agreement to the terms of the document.

The defendant argued that he “did not have time to review the contract” and that the emoji It was just a response of “having received the contract”.

We recommend you

that’s how it was solved

Interestingly, Justice Timothy Keene relied on the definition of emoji from Dictionary.com to clarify your decision. “It is used to express assent, approval, or encouragement in digital communications, especially in Western cultures.”

β€œThis court readily acknowledges that a emoji πŸ‘ it is a non-traditional way to ‘sign’ a document, but nonetheless, in the circumstances, it was a valid way to convey both purposes of a ‘signature’,” the judge wrote.

In finding that the thumbs-up can be used to enter into contracts, Keene said the court “cannot (and should not) attempt to stem the tide of technology and common use” of the emoji.

“This seems to be the new reality of Canadian society and the courts will have to be prepared to deal with the new challenges that may arise from the use of emoji and others,” he says.

As a penalty, the farmer will now have to pay $61,442 for the broken contract.

Shawn Jacobs

"Incurable alcohol evangelist. Unapologetic pop culture scholar. Subtly charming webaholic."

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *